O Caso Richard Jewell
A história real de Richard Jewell, segurança que se tornou um dos principais suspeitos de bombardear as Olimpíadas de Atlanta, em 1996, depois de ajudar inocentes a fugirem do local e avisar da existência de um dos explosivos.
Where to watch
Sponsored links — ValorScore may earn a commission. This does not influence the scores.
ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.
Frequently asked questions
Is "O Caso Richard Jewell" appropriate for children?
ValorScore's Content Advisory for "O Caso Richard Jewell" is "Moderate" (28/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. One example of the evidence behind this reading: the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "O Caso Richard Jewell" have woke/ideological content?
In ValorScore's editorial reading, "O Caso Richard Jewell" has ideological presence rated "Clean". This is opinion backed by evidence, not a verdict: one cited example is the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 91/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- AI reference — unverifiedA obra retrata a explosão física de uma bomba caseira em meio a uma multidão, exibindo brevemente o momento do impacto, a correria subsequente e pessoas feridas caídas no chão com sangue visível, porém sem foco prolongado em ferimentos graves ou mutilações.
- AI reference — unverifiedA obra apresenta uma cena curta de teor sugestivo na qual uma repórter flerta intimamente e faz insinuações com o intuito de obter informações sigilosas de um agente policial em um bar e em um carro.
- AI reference — unverifiedThe defense attorney Watson Bryant and reporter Kathy Scruggs frequently use strong language, including multiple vulgarities, throughout their dialogue in the film.
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family0.0AI Analysis · Model: Gemini (IA)
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
- Faith Subversion0.0AI Analysis · Model: Gemini (IA)
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.