
Segredos de Sangue
No dia do aniversário de 18 anos de India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska), seu pai sofre um acidente de carro e morre. A convivência desta garota tímida com a sua mãe (Nicole Kidman) torna-se ainda mais problemática, fato agravado pela visita dos parentes durante o funeral. Entre os familiares presentes, está o tio Charlie (Matthew Goode), um aventureiro que passou a vida inteira entre as cidades da Europa, sem dar sinal de vida. India nunca soube da existência desse homem, mas logo a sua presença traz à tona o sombrio passado da família Stoker.
Where to watch
Sponsored links — ValorScore may earn a commission. This does not influence the scores.
ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.
Frequently asked questions
Is "Segredos de Sangue" appropriate for children?
ValorScore's Content Advisory for "Segredos de Sangue" is "Moderate" (33/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. One example of the evidence behind this reading: the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "Segredos de Sangue" have woke/ideological content?
In ValorScore's editorial reading, "Segredos de Sangue" has ideological presence rated "Moderate". This is opinion backed by evidence, not a verdict: one cited example is “I've often wondered why it is we have children. And the conclusion I've come to is that... we want someone to get it right this time. But not me. Personally, I can't wait to watch life tear you apart.” (A obra apresenta uma cena na qual ocorre um diálogo de teor cínico e desapegado sobre a maternidade. Nesse momento do filme, há a expressão de que os filhos são gerados apenas com a intenção de que acertem onde os pais erraram, concluindo com uma declaração de desinteresse pelo bem-estar da filha.). The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 68/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- I've often wondered why it is we have children. And the conclusion I've come to is that... we want someone to get it right this time. But not me. Personally, I can't wait to watch life tear you apart.AI reference — unverifiedA obra apresenta uma cena na qual ocorre um diálogo de teor cínico e desapegado sobre a maternidade. Nesse momento do filme, há a expressão de que os filhos são gerados apenas com a intenção de que acertem onde os pais erraram, concluindo com uma declaração de desinteresse pelo bem-estar da filha.
- AI reference — unverifiedIndia shoots Uncle Charlie in the head with a hunting rifle, spraying blood across her mother's face and the wall.
- AI reference — unverifiedIndia stabs a sheriff's deputy in the neck with garden shears, resulting in a graphic spray of blood.
- AI reference — unverifiedUncle Charlie behaves in a highly suggestive and seductive manner with both his sister-in-law Evelyn and his niece India.
- AI reference — unverifiedIndia has a highly sexualized masturbation sequence in a shower while experiencing flashbacks of Uncle Charlie's violent actions.
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family3.0AI Analysis · Model: IA
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
View evidence (1)
Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- I've often wondered why it is we have children. And the conclusion I've come to is that... we want someone to get it right this time. But not me. Personally, I can't wait to watch life tear you apart.
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.