Confirmation
Judge Clarence Thomas' nomination to the United States' Supreme Court is called into question when former colleague, Anita Hill, testifies that he had sexually harassed her.
Where to watch
We couldn't find streaming availability right now — try JustWatch for your region.
Search on JustWatchOK for ages 12+, with caveats: moderate sexual content, mild language
Help keep this analysis accurate
Embed this badge
Paste on your site: the badge shows the current ValorScore and links back here. Attribution and the link are required.
<a href="https://valorscore.com/en/media/confirmation--2eb5675c-fa81-4174-a848-d9c0082fd3e9" rel="noopener" target="_blank"> <img src="https://valorscore.com/api/badge/2eb5675c-fa81-4174-a848-d9c0082fd3e9?locale=en" alt="ValorScore for Confirmation" width="216" height="60" /> </a>
Premium
Want the AI’s scene-by-scene take on this title? Premium unlocks the AI chat, your personalized manifesto, and the age verdict for your kids.
From $3.99/mo
Get PremiumFrequently asked questions
Is "Confirmation" appropriate for children?
ValorScore's Content Advisory for "Confirmation" is "Moderate" (18/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "Confirmation" have woke/ideological content?
In ValorScore's editorial reading, "Confirmation" has ideological presence rated "Heavy". This is editorial opinion, not a verdict — see the axes and their evidence in the breakdown below. The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 46/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
Per-axis score breakdown
Axes on a 0–10 scale (the score at the top of the page runs 0 to 100).
AI analysis · reviewed by the community · How we calculate the scores
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Historical Revisionism3.0AI Analysis
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.
