Who edits ValorScore
The editorial team, the process, and the transparency commitments. Updated July 26, 2026.
1. Who edits
ValorScore editorial content — the scores, the blog posts, and the curated lists — is signed by the VALORSCORE EDITORIAL TEAM. The initial reading of each work is made by AI, but nothing is published without human curation: an editor reviews the axes that carry judgment, requires the evidence behind every claim, and discards what cannot be verified.
We analyze WORKS — movies, series, games, books, and music — never the personal conduct of the people who made them. Every score is opinion accompanied by evidence, never a factual verdict.
2. How we write
The house rule is simple: evidence before the number. An axis only receives a meaningful score when there is a concrete, verifiable justification — a scene, a line, an element of the work itself. Where there is not enough evidence, we would rather leave the axis without a claim than publish a guess dressed up as data.
The full axis-by-axis criteria are published at en/metodologia. Our perspective is openly declared at en/sobre — we do not claim a neutrality the data could not support.
3. How we correct
Making mistakes is part of covering a large catalog; correcting them in public is part of deserving trust. Anyone can flag an error with the "Report" button on the work's page, and every report enters the human-review queue.
The full process — and the public log of corrections made — is at en/correcoes. Parties responsible for an evaluated work also have the Right of Reply channel, at en/right-of-reply.
4. Editorial contact
Criticism, corrections, and story suggestions are welcome — that is how the tool improves.
Contact: suporte@valorscore.com.