Fan-Fan the Tulip

Name: Fan-Fan the Tulip
Released: 2003

Movie20035.5ValorScore 78/100· Very good

In this 2003 remake of the classic 1952 French film, Fanfan la Tulipe is a swashbuckling lover who is tricked into joining the army of King Louis XV by Adeline La Franchise, who tells Fanfan that by doing so, he will eventually marry one of the king's daughters

Where to watch

We couldn't find streaming availability right now — try JustWatch for your region.

Search on JustWatch

OK for ages 12+, with caveats: moderate sexual content, mild violence

ValorScore

78/100Very good

VirtuesLow+37/100

Content Advisory23/100· content

Help keep this analysis accurate

Embed this badge

Paste on your site: the badge shows the current ValorScore and links back here. Attribution and the link are required.

<a href="https://valorscore.com/en/media/fan-fan-the-tulip--a5219d76-fc9e-4f9f-8a4b-10722acec6c0" rel="noopener" target="_blank">
  <img src="https://valorscore.com/api/badge/a5219d76-fc9e-4f9f-8a4b-10722acec6c0?locale=en" alt="ValorScore for Fan-Fan the Tulip" width="216" height="60" />
</a>

License terms →

Premium

Want the AI’s scene-by-scene take on this title? Premium unlocks the AI chat, your personalized manifesto, and the age verdict for your kids.

From $3.99/mo

Get Premium

Frequently asked questions

Is "Fan-Fan the Tulip" appropriate for children?

ValorScore's Content Advisory for "Fan-Fan the Tulip" is "Moderate" (23/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.

See the per-axis breakdown

Does "Fan-Fan the Tulip" have woke/ideological content?

In ValorScore's editorial reading, "Fan-Fan the Tulip" has ideological presence rated "Mild". This is editorial opinion, not a verdict — see the axes and their evidence in the breakdown below. The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 78/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.

See the per-axis breakdown

Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.

Per-axis score breakdown

Axes on a 0–10 scale (the score at the top of the page runs 0 to 100).

AI analysis · reviewed by the community · How we calculate the scores

Ideological reading (editorial opinion)

This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.

Anti-Family1.0
AI Analysis

Your review

Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.

Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.

Ideological(4)

Identity PoliticsFraming that reduces characters to identity-group grievances or activism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 incidental framing · 7 a recurring lens · 10 the work’s core message
Historical RevisionismRewriting historical facts or figures to fit a contemporary agenda.Severity0Reference scale: 0 accurate · 3 a minor liberty · 7 clearly reshaped facts · 10 history rewritten wholesale
Faith SubversionMocking, distorting, or undermining religious faith and the sacred.Severity0Reference scale: 0 respectful · 3 a passing jab · 7 sustained mockery · 10 the sacred systematically degraded
Anti-FamilyPortraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a stray remark · 7 a recurring theme · 10 the family portrayed as the enemy

Content(4)

Inappropriate SexualizationSexual content that is gratuitous or targets minors/underage characters.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a suggestive moment · 7 recurring explicit content · 10 pervasive/exploitative content
Graphic ViolenceExplicit, dwelling, or glorified depictions of violence and gore.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 brief or implied violence · 7 explicit violence with gore · 10 prolonged, glorified brutality
ProfanityFrequency and intensity of coarse language, slurs, and blasphemy.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 occasional mild language · 7 frequent strong language · 10 constant slurs or blasphemy
Drug GlamorizationPresenting drug or substance abuse as cool, harmless, or aspirational.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none or shown negatively · 3 incidental use, not glamorized · 7 use shown as cool/harmless · 10 drug use central and aspirational

Values(6)

Pro-FamilyHonoring marriage, parenthood, and loyalty between generations.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 incidental warmth · 7 a clear pro-family thread · 10 family bonds are the work’s central triumph
Christian Faith & TranscendenceSincere treatment of faith, the sacred, and transcendent meaning.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or mocking · 3 a passing sincere moment · 7 sustained sincere treatment · 10 transcendence is the work’s central theme
Virtue & HeroismCourage, sacrifice, honesty, and genuine moral heroism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or subverted · 3 a minor heroic gesture · 7 a clear heroic arc · 10 sacrificial heroism drives the whole story
Patriotism / WesternAppreciation for nation, heritage, and the Western civilizational tradition.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 a passing nod · 7 clear appreciation of heritage · 10 defense of Western civilization is central
Artistic IntegrityCraft, coherence, and honest artistic intent over cynical formula.Severity0Reference scale: 0 cynical or formulaic · 3 competent but generic · 7 clear craft and honest intent · 10 exceptional, uncompromising vision
Artistic MeritOverall aesthetic quality: writing, direction, performance, and craft.Severity0Reference scale: 0 poor craft throughout · 3 uneven but watchable · 7 well-crafted across the board · 10 masterful writing, direction and performance

Review titleReviewContains spoiler