Hacks
Explore a dark mentorship that forms between Deborah Vance, a legendary Las Vegas comedian, and an entitled, outcast 25-year-old.
Where to watch
Better for ages 16+: heavy language, moderate sexual content
Help keep this analysis accurate
Embed this badge
Paste on your site: the badge shows the current ValorScore and links back here. Attribution and the link are required.
<a href="https://valorscore.com/en/media/hacks--851b0329-f678-4513-a8c7-caf057931223" rel="noopener" target="_blank"> <img src="https://valorscore.com/api/badge/851b0329-f678-4513-a8c7-caf057931223?locale=en" alt="ValorScore for Hacks" width="216" height="60" /> </a>
Premium
Want the AI’s scene-by-scene take on this title? Premium unlocks the AI chat and your personalized manifesto.
From $3.99/mo
Get PremiumFrequently asked questions
Is "Hacks" appropriate for children?
ValorScore's Content Advisory for "Hacks" is "Heavy" (45/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "Hacks" have woke/ideological content?
In ValorScore's editorial reading, "Hacks" has ideological presence rated "Heavy". This is editorial opinion, not a verdict — see the axes and their evidence in the breakdown below. The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 60/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
Per-axis score breakdown
Axes on a 0–10 scale (the score at the top of the page runs 0 to 100).
AI analysis · reviewed by the community · How we calculate the scores
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family3.0AI Analysis
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.
