Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam

Movie19886.8ValorScore 88/100· Very good

Frank Cross é um diretor de uma rede de televisão que é frio e só pensa na audiência. Ele se encontra com Lew Hayward, um falecido amigo, que o avisa sobre três fantasmas (o do Natal Passado, o do Presente e do Futuro) que irão visitá-lo e diz para ele estar atento a tudo que eles mostrarem, pois esta é a única oportunidade de Frank se salvar.

Where to watch

We couldn't find streaming availability right now — try JustWatch for your region.

Search on JustWatch

OK for ages 12+, with caveats: mild violence, mild language

ValorScore

88/100Very good

VirtuesModerate+55/100

Content Advisory20/100· content

Help keep this analysis accurate

Embed this badge

Paste on your site: the badge shows the current ValorScore and links back here. Attribution and the link are required.

<a href="https://valorscore.com/en/media/os-fantasmas-contra-atacam--5c1b71cd-7e27-44fc-8e00-8ab25b61ac9e" rel="noopener" target="_blank">
  <img src="https://valorscore.com/api/badge/5c1b71cd-7e27-44fc-8e00-8ab25b61ac9e?locale=en" alt="ValorScore for Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam" width="216" height="60" />
</a>

License terms →

Premium

Want the AI’s scene-by-scene take on this title? Premium unlocks the AI chat, your personalized manifesto, and the age verdict for your kids.

From $3.99/mo

Get Premium

Frequently asked questions

Is "Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam" appropriate for children?

ValorScore's Content Advisory for "Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam" is "Moderate" (20/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.

See the per-axis breakdown

Does "Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam" have woke/ideological content?

In ValorScore's editorial reading, "Os Fantasmas Contra-Atacam" has ideological presence rated "Clean". This is editorial opinion, not a verdict — see the axes and their evidence in the breakdown below. The overall ValorScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 88/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.

See the per-axis breakdown

Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.

Per-axis score breakdown

Axes on a 0–10 scale (the score at the top of the page runs 0 to 100).

AI analysis · reviewed by the community · How we calculate the scores

Ideological reading (editorial opinion)

This is ValorScore’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.

No alerts recorded (4)

Anti-Family0.0
AI Analysis

Your review

Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.

Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.

Ideological(4)

Identity PoliticsFraming that reduces characters to identity-group grievances or activism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 incidental framing · 7 a recurring lens · 10 the work’s core message
Historical RevisionismRewriting historical facts or figures to fit a contemporary agenda.Severity0Reference scale: 0 accurate · 3 a minor liberty · 7 clearly reshaped facts · 10 history rewritten wholesale
Faith SubversionMocking, distorting, or undermining religious faith and the sacred.Severity0Reference scale: 0 respectful · 3 a passing jab · 7 sustained mockery · 10 the sacred systematically degraded
Anti-FamilyPortraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a stray remark · 7 a recurring theme · 10 the family portrayed as the enemy

Content(4)

Inappropriate SexualizationSexual content that is gratuitous or targets minors/underage characters.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a suggestive moment · 7 recurring explicit content · 10 pervasive/exploitative content
Graphic ViolenceExplicit, dwelling, or glorified depictions of violence and gore.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 brief or implied violence · 7 explicit violence with gore · 10 prolonged, glorified brutality
ProfanityFrequency and intensity of coarse language, slurs, and blasphemy.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 occasional mild language · 7 frequent strong language · 10 constant slurs or blasphemy
Drug GlamorizationPresenting drug or substance abuse as cool, harmless, or aspirational.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none or shown negatively · 3 incidental use, not glamorized · 7 use shown as cool/harmless · 10 drug use central and aspirational

Values(6)

Pro-FamilyHonoring marriage, parenthood, and loyalty between generations.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 incidental warmth · 7 a clear pro-family thread · 10 family bonds are the work’s central triumph
Christian Faith & TranscendenceSincere treatment of faith, the sacred, and transcendent meaning.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or mocking · 3 a passing sincere moment · 7 sustained sincere treatment · 10 transcendence is the work’s central theme
Virtue & HeroismCourage, sacrifice, honesty, and genuine moral heroism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or subverted · 3 a minor heroic gesture · 7 a clear heroic arc · 10 sacrificial heroism drives the whole story
Patriotism / WesternAppreciation for nation, heritage, and the Western civilizational tradition.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 a passing nod · 7 clear appreciation of heritage · 10 defense of Western civilization is central
Artistic IntegrityCraft, coherence, and honest artistic intent over cynical formula.Severity0Reference scale: 0 cynical or formulaic · 3 competent but generic · 7 clear craft and honest intent · 10 exceptional, uncompromising vision
Artistic MeritOverall aesthetic quality: writing, direction, performance, and craft.Severity0Reference scale: 0 poor craft throughout · 3 uneven but watchable · 7 well-crafted across the board · 10 masterful writing, direction and performance

Review titleReviewContains spoiler